CO129-115 - Sir MacDonnell - 1866 [9-10] — Page 93

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

92

2.

It does not appear that the complete formal assent of the Military Authorities has been given to the construction of that road.

It is true that Mr. Mercer in his despatch No. 906 of 31st December 1865 reports all objections of the War Department (No. 1759/65) as being happily withdrawn; but nevertheless I only find as authority for that statement amongst the enclosures to that despatch a private note from Colonel Stuart, Commanding Royal Engineers, stating that the road "would" not be objected to by the Home Authorities, "so that there appears to be no objection" to the proposition now being put into form.

On 15th December 1865, he merely acknowledges Mr. Mercer's announcement of the War Department having withdrawn their former objections. It does not, however, seem that any further action has since been taken to put the matter in the official form mentioned by Colonel Stuart.

Unfortunately, that officer is absent at present in Japan. Nevertheless, under the circumstances, it is quite clear that no objections do exist on the part of the War Department to the road - entirely apart from any question as to the actual extent of the Cantonments adverted, the extent of which is a matter to be decided in an official form.

#

My despatch No. 56 of the 7th June 7494.

3.

In My Lord Cardwell's reply No. 34, 26th February 206, 1757/65.

Edit History

2026-05-19 11:29:38 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
92 2. It does not appear that the complete formal assent of the Military Authorities has been given to the construction of that road. It is true that Mr. Mercer in his despatch No. 906 of 31st December 1865 reports all objections of the War Department (No. 1759/65) as being happily withdrawn; but nevertheless I only find as authority for that statement amongst the enclosures to that despatch a private note from Colonel Stuart, Commanding Royal Engineers, stating that the road "would" not be objected to by the Home Authorities, "so that there appears to be no objection" to the proposition now being put into form. On 15th December 1865, he merely acknowledges Mr. Mercer's announcement of the War Department having withdrawn their former objections. It does not, however, seem that any further action has since been taken to put the matter in the official form mentioned by Colonel Stuart. Unfortunately, that officer is absent at present in Japan. Nevertheless, under the circumstances, it is quite clear that no objections do exist on the part of the War Department to the road - entirely apart from any question as to the actual extent of the Cantonments adverted, the extent of which is a matter to be decided in an official form. # My despatch No. 56 of the 7th June 7494. 3. In My Lord Cardwell's reply No. 34, 26th February 206, 1757/65.
Baseline (Original)
92 2. It does not appio that the complete formal assent of the Military Authorities has been road. given to the Construction of that It is true that Mr allerer in his despatch 906 of 312 December 1865 286 reports all objections of the War Department 1759/65 no" being happily withdrawn but- nevertheless I only find as authority for that statement amongst the enclosures to that despatch a private note from Colonel Sovell Commanding Rojob Engineers stating that the rood "world" not be objected to by the Home Anthorities, objection "so that there appears to be no 'te the proposition now being fint into "to 15 December 1805 he merely ackinnoledges Mr Merce's announcement of the War Department- having withdrawn their former Objections. It dow not however seems that any further action has since been taken to furt the matter in the official form mentioned by Colonel fructe. み、 unfortunality that officer is absent at present in Japom. Nevertheles under the crcumstances it is quite clear that no objections do ceist on the part of the War Department to the road- entirely apart from actual extent of the Cantonments adverted. the emstinction of which is a matter any question as to the 56 to in an official form # my desportato nv56 of the 7th list 7494 June 3. In My Cardwell's reply No. 34.26- Beby 206 1757165
2026-05-19 11:29:38 · Baseline
View content

92

2.

It does not appio that the complete formal assent of the Military Authorities

has been

road.

given

to the Construction of that

It is true that Mr allerer in

his despatch 906 of 312 December 1865

286

reports all objections of the War Department 1759/65 no" being happily withdrawn

but-

nevertheless I only find as authority for that statement amongst the enclosures to that despatch a private note from Colonel Sovell Commanding Rojob Engineers stating that the rood "world" not be objected to by the Home Anthorities,

objection "so that there appears to be no

'te the proposition now being fint into

"to

15 December 1805

he merely ackinnoledges

Mr Merce's

announcement of the War Department- having withdrawn their former Objections. It dow not however seems that any further action has since been taken to furt the matter in the official form

mentioned by Colonel fructe.

み、

unfortunality that officer is

absent at present in Japom. Nevertheles

under the crcumstances it is quite

clear that no

objections do ceist on

the

part of the War Department to the road-

entirely apart from

actual extent of the Cantonments adverted.

the emstinction

of which is a matter

any question as to the

56

to in

an

official form

#

my desportato nv56 of the 7th list

7494

June

3.

In My Cardwell's reply

No. 34.26- Beby

206

1757165

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.